Butcher v. City of Detroit
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff, Janet Butcher, filed this suit claiming that defendant City of Detroit’s ordinance (124-H §§ 12-7-1 et seq.) requiring an inspection for one-and two-family dwellings at the point of sale was unconstitutional. On June 3, 1982, the trial judge granted plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment, finding that defendant city lacked authority to pass the ordinance and that the ordinance constituted a taking of property without due process of law. On appeal, this Court reversed the trial judge’s grant of partial summary judgment, expressly finding that defendant city had authority to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Manistee Bank & Trust Co. v. McGowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Dome Realty, Inc. v. City of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Swenson v. Emerson Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mainstreet Organization of Realtors v. Calumet CityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- City of Vincennes v. EmmonsIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Northgate Towers Associates v. Royal Oak Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Lock Haven Property Owners' Ass'n v. City of Lock HavenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- City of Vincennes v. EmmonsIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.