Legal Opinion

State v. Backus Chevrolet Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 9, 1936No. [No. 56, January Term, 1936.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The -purpose of this suit by the State of Maryland against the Backus Chevrolet Company, Inc., is to recover taxes claimed by the State to be due from the defendant corporation under the Emergency Gross Receipts Tax Law. As enacted by chapter 188 of the Acts of 1935 of the General Assembly, to add new sections to article 56 of the Code (Supp. 1929), the statute provides:

“For the privilege of engaging in the business of selling tangible personal property at retail, there is hereby imposed upon every person engaging in such business a license fee or tax, in addition to all other fees or taxes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Levin v. HewesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  2. Ruark v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 37Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  3. Jones v. GordyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  4. Board of Shellfish Commissioners v. MansfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Hallenberg-Wagner Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. McGlaughlin v. WarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API