Legal Opinion

Straus v. Spiegel, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 24, 1946No. 8923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

The District Court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss this action to recover for a real estate broker’s commission because the complaint failed to state a cause of action against the defendant.

There were two complaints filed by the plaintiff. The amended complaint pleaded in some detail the facts.1 Defendant argued, and the court agreed, that these facts failed to show any employment of plaintiff by defendant. Our inquiry is, therefore, directed to the specific language of the complaint to determine the very narrow question, — Was plaintiff employed by the defendant ?

We…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Washer v. Bullitt CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Wright v. RisserAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  3. People ex rel. Nelson v. Central Manufacturing District BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  4. Hafemann v. SeymerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Harten v. LofflerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cole v. BrundageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API