Legal Opinion

City of Waukegan v. DeWolf

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1913PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from the Comity Court of Lake county; the Hon. David T. Smiley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

The city of Waukegan, appellant, filed its petition in the county court of Lake county asking the court to confirm a special assessment to pay the cost of constructing a viaduct. The court sustained an objection of the appellees that the proposed work did not constitute a local improvement and dismissed the petition. The case ,is stated by counsel for appellant as follows: “This is a case wherein Genesee street, the chief business thoroughfare of the city of Waukegan, became severed into two parts, by the closing, on account of dilapidation, of an old structure spanning a ravine which bisects…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Board of TrusteesIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State ex rel. Stateler v. ReisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. City of Chicago v. BlairIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. City of Chicago v. LawIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. City of East St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Pepin v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. Fisher v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People Ex Rel. Hanrahan v. CaliendoIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  4. City of Globe v. WillisArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  5. City of Naperville v. WehrleIllinois Supreme Court · 1930

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API