Legal Opinion

Clark v. Rodes

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 10, 1876PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Case 3 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM BOYLE CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Civil Code, sections 411, 412, 418. General Statutes, 564. 1 Duvall, 56, Stone v. McConnell. 2 Parsons on Contracts, 285. 3 Atk. 503, Welford v. Beazly. 2 M. A V. 653, Johnson v. Dodgson. 14 John. 102, Menit v. Ciaron.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE LINDSAY

delivered the opinion op the court.

Clifton Rodes, as the assignee of R. M. Graham, held and owned the promissory note of James Clark, due Aug. 1, 1871, for the sum of $2,647.42. Said note bore interest at the rate of six per centum per annum, and its payment was secured by a mortgage on real property.

Rodes sued Clark, and sought to have the mortgaged property subjected to the payment of his debt. On the 5th day of September, 1871, the parties appeared in court, and upon the agreement of Clark the court entered judgment against him for the amount of the note, “ with interest…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bridges v. McAlisterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  2. Porter v. SmallOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Middleton v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Torian v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Shields' Administrators v. ChesserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API