Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lane v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1957No. 28859Published

1ConcurrenceDavidson, Judge

Upon the original disposition of this case I filed a dissenting opinion in which I expressed the view, now entertained by a majority of this court, that Sec. (A) of Art. *599801, P.C., Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 801(A), under which this prosecution was brought and maintained, was not a valid law but had been repealed and superseded by Art. 6701d, Vernon’s R.C.S.

My dissenting opinion is now withdrawn and, in lieu thereof, I file this concurring opinion setting forth reasons why I think the majority opinion is correct.

It takes no legal reasoning to demonstrate that, if at the time the offense here…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hunt v. AtkinsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Fortinberry v. State ex rel. MyersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Ex Parte SanfordCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Hunt v. AtkinsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API