Legal Opinion

Sheffield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 1957No. 28776PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of passing and uttering a forged instrument in writing relating to and affecting title to land, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.

The prosecution and conviction is under Article 1008 of Title 14, Ch. 2, Vernon’s Ann. P.C., Acts of 1876, Fifteenth Legislature, Page 59 et seq., which provides, in part, as follows:

“Every person who knowingly utters, publishes, passes, or uses, or who in any way aids, assists in or advises the uttering, publishing, passing or using as true and genuine any false, forged, altered, or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hunt v. AtkinsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Fortinberry v. State ex rel. MyersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Hunt v. AtkinsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Ex Parte TownsendCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Mahaney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Becknell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Collection Consultants, Inc. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Bank of Texas v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API