Legal Opinion
Campo v. Electro-Coal Transfer Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 21, 1992No. 89-3738Published
1Opinion of the Court
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. No. 89–3738. Curtis CAMPO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. ELECTRO–COAL TRANSFER CORP., Defendant–Appellee. Aug. 28, 1992. On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, SMITH and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: This court previously affirmed the district court's entry of a directed verdict against plaintiff Curtis Campo.1 Our earlier opinion relied upon Pizzitolo v. Electro–Coal Transfer Corp.,
812 F.2d 977, 983
(5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1059, 108 S.Ct. 1013,
98 L.Ed.2d 978
(1988),…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Offshore Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Jethro Barrett v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., E.B.B. Co., Inc. And Lift Barge, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Company, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Southwest Marine, Inc. v. GizoniSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Michael Guidry v. Continental Oil Company, Travelers Insurance Company, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.