Legal Opinion
Stout v. Peugeot Motors of America
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 26, 1986No. Civ. A. 85-677PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a Philadelphia-area Peugeot dealer, originally brought this suit alleging that Peugeot Motors of America (Peugeot), three former Peugeot Employees, and Peugeot’s parent company had conspired to injure his business in violation of the Sherman Act and of state tort law. On November 26, 1984, I entered an Order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s antitrust claim, and dismissing the claims against the individual defendants for want of personal jurisidiction. On April 4, 1985,1 entered an order granting the motion for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin & Creskoff v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., in No. 75-2405 v. Videfreeze Corporation, and David E. Chinnery Development Corp., Inno. 75-2406Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Yaindl v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. Standard Pump-Aldrich DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Glazer v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sun Co. v. Badger Design & Constructors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Valley Forge Convention & Visitors Bureau v. Visitor's Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Rahemtulla v. HassamDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Peoples Mortgage Co. v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Permenter v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.