Legal Opinion

State v. Meadows

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 7, 1975No. 43999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

Todd, Justice.

Defendant, found guilty by a district court jury on a charge of simple robbery, Minn. St. 609.24, and sentenced by the trial court to a maximum indeterminate term of 10 years’ imprisonment, 1 appeals from judgment of conviction, raising a number of issues. After careful consideration of these issues, we affirm.

Defendant’s contention that there was insufficient evidence connecting him to the robbery has no merit whatever. The evidence connecting defendant to the robbery included the positive identification testimony of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. State v. FulfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. State v. SeelyeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TitworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. State v. KlosterboerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API