Legal Opinion

Tracey v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 2, 1969No. [No. 59, September Term, 1969.]Published

1Opinion of the CourtSingley, J.

This case involves the interplay between the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Statute of Maryland, Maryland Code (1957, 1967 Repl. Vol.) Art. 66^, § 150 et seq. (the Maryland Fund) and that of New Jersey, N.J.S.A. 39:6-61 (1961) (the New Jersey Fund). 1 The appellants, James Tracey and Mattie Ames, residents of New Jersey, brought suit against Ruby Mae Bracey, a resident of Maryland, for damages for injuries they had sustained in an accident in Maryland involving a car owned and operated by Mrs. Bracey in which the appellants were passengers. When judgments of $1,250 and costs entered in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maddy v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  2. Lippman v. OstrumSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. United States v. Arthur Engene WhitcombCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  4. Betz v. Director of Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API