Legal Opinion

Tingle v. Parkston Grain Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1989No. 16220PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*253MORGAN, Justice.

Diamond Building System (Diamond) appeals from a default judgment entered against it in this mechanic’s lien foreclosure action brought by Merlin Tingle, d/b/a M T Buildings (Tingle). We affirm.

Diamond employed Tingle to erect a grain storage facility for Parkston Grain Company (Parkston Grain). Tingle completed the facility on October 6, 1986, and filed a mechanic’s lien on January 13, 1987. Controversy had arisen between Tingle and Diamond over Tingle’s bill for this job and other matters. The parties attempted to negotiate their differences until July 8, 1987. At that time,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Routledge v. RoutledgeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Antonen v. SwansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Haggar v. OlfertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Ackerman v. BurgardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Parker v. O'PHELANCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hrachovec v. KaarupSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Colton Lumber Co. v. SiemonsmaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Zarecky v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Barnaud v. Belle Fourche Irrigation DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Donald Bucklin Construction v. McCormick Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API