Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Kalish

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2008No. 2007-1703Published

1DissentLanzinger, J.

{¶ 43} I respectfully dissent. The standard of appellate review of felony sentences remains unchanged by State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470. In reviewing any felony sentence, an appellate court must determine whether the record clearly and convincingly demonstrates that the sentence is contrary to law. R.C. 2953.08(G)(2).

{¶ 44} Before considering the plurality’s new interpretation of Foster’s effect on sentencing appeals, it is important to look at the governing statute. To justify its holding, the plurality interprets a statute to mean the opposite of what it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. SimpkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. Burton, 06ap-690 (4-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API