Winnie Mae Knuckles v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
There are two matters before this panel as of the hearing date, (1) the motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal as moot (filed on November 27, 1974); and (2) the appeal on the merits from the trial court’s dismissal of plaintiffs’ cause of action based on lack of jurisdiction.
As to the Motion to Dismiss, it is based upon the Social Security Administration decision (made subsequent to the district court’s decision below), that it should and did sustain the claims of Mrs. Knuckles and Mrs. Johnson and restored them to full benefit status before the briefs were filed on this appeal.
Howe…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Ellis v. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- 4 soc.sec.rep.ser. 80, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 15,133 Mario Lopez v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Elliott v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Nathan S. Smith v. Arthur R. Grimm and Jeannine GrimmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Nguyen Da Yen, Cross-Appellees v. Henry Kissinger, Secretary of State, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.