Legal Opinion

In re A.R.M.F.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 H.E.F. (father) and C.D.F. (mother) filed consolidated appeals from the order of the trial court terminating them parental rights to their daughters, A.R.M.F. and M.B.F. (children). We affirm.

¶2 Mother gave birth to A.R.M.F. on July 13, 1997, and to M.B.F. on May 9, 1999. On November 4, 1999, the Bucks County Children & Youth Social Services Agency (Agency) filed a petition to adjudicate the children dependent and remove them from the home. In its petition, the *1233Agency stated that it had escalating concerns for the children despite the fact that it had been providing services…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Adoption of AtencioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. In Re the Adoption of G.T.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. In Re Adoption of T.M.F.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. In Re Adoption by ShivesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. In Re Julissa O.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Z.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. In re Interest of S.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. In the Interest of T.M.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. In Re SHSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API