Legal Opinion

Lakeview Farms, Inc. v. Patten

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1994No. 92A03-9311-CV-387PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Lakeview Farms, Inc. (“Lakeview”) appeals the judgment in favor of Raymond R. Patten (“Patten”) on Patten’s claim for breach of an oral employment agreement to procure medical insurance. Lakeview presents four issues for our review, only one of which we must address. Restated, it is whether the trial court erred in denying Lakeview’s motion for judgment on the evidence regarding the existence of an oral contract to procure Patten’s medical insurance.

We reverse.

The facts most favorable to the verdict reveal that Lakeview hired Patten as a full-time farm employee on October…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rieth-Riley Construction Co. v. Auto-Owners Mutual InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Dahlin v. Amoco Oil Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Bulla v. DonahueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Sipes v. OSMOSE WOOD PRESERVING CO. OF AM., INC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Action Ads, Inc. v. JudesWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stock v. GranthamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API