Legal Opinion

Moniz v. Moniz

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1966No. Civ. 22716PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.

J.— The question in this case is what, if any, discretion a court has to withhold execution for unpaid installments under a property settlement agreement which has been incorporated into a judgment. The parties have been before this court in two earlier appeals, Moniz v. Moniz, 142 Cal.App.2d 527 [298 P.2d 710], and Moniz v. Moniz, 142 Cal.App.2d 641 [299 P.2d 329]. It is not questioned by the parties, and indeed it is the law of the case from the second appeal (142 Cal.App.2d at p. 644), that the judgment is not subject to modification because of the integrated character of the property…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Messenger v. MessengerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Moniz v. MonizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Moniz v. MonizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Szamocki v. SzamockiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Cordero v. CorderoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Simonet v. SimonetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API