Legal Opinion

A. H. Belo & Co. v. Fuller

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1892No. 7247PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHES, Judge,

Section B. — This is a suit by appellee against A. H. Belo, J. J. Hand, and D. C. Jenkins, composing the firm of A. H. Belo & Co., to recover damages for a libel alleged to have been published and circulated by A. H. Belo & Co., in the Galveston Hews, on the 10th day of February, 1887. Defendants answered, alleging, in substance, that A. H. Belo & Co. was a corporation at the time of said publication, and that the individuals sued were not personally liable for the acts of the corporation; that the libellous matter was retracted; that they entertained no malice toward the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. RichmondTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. A. H. Belo & Co. v. WrenTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Boldt v. BudwigNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Republican Pub. Co. v. MosmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  5. Mahoney v. BelfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Lyle v. WaddleTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Renfro Drug Co. v. LawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Sutton v. Reagan & GeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Christy v. Stauffer Publications, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Permian Petroleum Company v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API