Legal Opinion

R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co. v. Pappas

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 24, 2022No. 2:21-cv-00753Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 R.R. DONNELLY & SONS COMPANY, No. 2:21-cv-00753-DAD-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 14 JOHN PAPPAS, III, et al. FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST 15 Defendants. TO SEAL PORTIONS OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 (Doc. Nos. 71, 72) 17 MERILIZ INC., 18 Counter-claimants, 19 v. 20 R.R. DONNELLY & SONS COMPANY, 21 Counter-defendant. 22 23 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s unopposed motion for leave to file a second…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Bowles v. ReadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Serpa v. SBC Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
  5. People v. LinemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API