Legal Opinion
Seible v. Denver Post Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 2, 1989No. 87CA1765PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge FISCHBACH.
In this libel action, plaintiff, Robert D. Seible, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants, the Denver Post, its reporter Claire Martin, and its editor Jane Marshall. Seible contends the trial court erred in concluding that he failed to present clear and convincing evidence establishing a 'prima facie case of defamation. We affirm.
This litigation arises out of a newspaper article which quoted certain comments made by Dale Coski, an advisor for the Denver Commission on the Disabled, regarding a petition submitted to the Commission by Seible,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Burns v. McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gordon v. BoylesColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- McIntyre v. JonesColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Keohane v. WilkersonColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Lockett v. GarrettColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Spacecon Specialty Contractors, LLC v. BensingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.