Legal Opinion
Keohane v. Wilkerson
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 20, 1993No. 91CA1840PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DAVIDSON.
In this action for defamation, defendants, Stephen Stewart, Terri Campbell, and Grover Wilkerson, appeal from a judgment en-
tered upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, Paul Keohane. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
At the time this action arose, Keohane was serving as a district court judge in Fremont County. In late October and early November of 1988, Keohane presided over a highly publicized trial to the court in which a local anesthesiologist accused of sexually assaulting a teenage patient was found not guilty by reason of impaired mental condition (the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. HeppsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Keohane v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Franklin v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Trout Point Lodge, Limited v. Doug HandshoeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Roussel v. RobbinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- At&T Communications of Pacific Northwest, Inc. v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.