Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 20, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPattangall, C. J.

On exceptions and motion. Action in tort to recover damages alleged to have been caused by negligence of defendant, resulting in the destruction by fire of certain property of plaintiffs. Verdict for plaintiffs. Damages assessed at $14,636.36, which amount by special finding of the jury “includes all claims for machinery and all other property in dispute.”

Plaintiffs were partners doing a general contracting business and occupying a large storehouse in which was kept their equipment, including a very substantial quantity of machinery and tools.

Defendant occupied two buildings in close…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Leo's Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962
  2. Kleinschmidt v. MorrowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. Simmons v. State Ex Rel. State Highway CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  4. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. RussellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Levasseur v. FieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API