Legal Opinion
Kleinschmidt v. Morrow
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 18, 1994PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
Maurice Morrow, d/b/a Maurice Morrow Construction, appeals and Hazel A. Kleinsehmidt cross-appeals from the entry of a judgment after a jury-waived trial in the Superior Court (Lincoln County, Perkins, J.) awarding compensatory damages to Kleinsehmidt on her complaint against Morrow. Morrow contends that the trial court erred in refusing to issue further findings of fact and conclusions of law and the evidence does not support the damages assessed against him. 1 By her cross-appeal, Kleinseh-midt contends that the trial court erred in refusing to award punitive damages to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dehahn v. InnesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- Nadeau v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Bartner v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Bayley v. BayleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Banville v. HuckinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Advanced Construction Corp. v. PileckiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- VanVoorhees v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Wachter v. Gratech Co., Ltd.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Mariello v. GiguereSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Wharton v. Tri-State Drilling & BoringSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.