Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Hettinger v. Dangerud

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1982No. Civ. 10089PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

Dangerud appeals from orders granting The First National Bank of Hettinger’s motion for summary judgment and denying Dangerud’s motion for summary judgment. Rule 56, NDRCivP. First National Bank moved to dismiss the appeal and Dangerud moved to amend the notice of appeal. We deny the motion to amend the notice of appeal, and grant the motion to dismiss the appeal.

This action was brought by First National Bank against Dangerud and Jacobson on two separate promissory notes. The court granted the Bank’s motion for summary judgment and, by separate orders, denied the motions of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farmers Cooperative Ass'n of Churchs Ferry v. ColeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Dangerfield v. MarkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Gebeke v. Arthur Mercantile CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Saetz v. HeiserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Cottle v. KranzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Piccagli v. North Dakota State Health DepartmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Simpler v. LowreyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Bye v. Federal Land Bank Ass'n of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. J. W. v. D. J. B. R.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. GrantNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API