Legal Opinion

Saetz v. Heiser

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1976No. Civ. 9181PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Judge.

Appellant Saetz owns Section 27-142-96 in Dunn County. He claims that his principal access to this property is over a section line right-of-way between Sections 33 and 34 lying south and southwest of Section 27. Appellees Heiser and Dvorak are the owners of land in Sections 33 and 34, and appel-lees Ferebee, Kussy and Klee are members of the board of county commissioners of Dunn County.

In March 1974 Saetz sued because the Dunn County board had first stopped maintaining a county road on the section line and later permitted Heiser and Dvorak to erect fences and engage in farming…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farmers Cooperative Ass'n of Churchs Ferry v. ColeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Small v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Newman v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Gebeke v. Arthur Mercantile CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Small v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. MeesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. United Plainsmen Ass'n v. North Dakota State Water Conservation CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Apple Creek Township v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Grace Lutheran Church v. North Dakota Employment Security BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hughes v. North Dakota Crime Victims Reparations BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API