Klase v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
McNEILLY, Justice:
Defendant appeals from jury convictions in Superior Court on charges of rape and possession of a deadly weapon during the commission of a felony. He contends that his due process rights were violated by an “impermissably suggestive” pretrial identification of a knife with which he allegedly forced the victim to acquiesce to sexual intercourse.
I
During pretrial investigation of the alleged crimes, the victim told police that de fendant had forced her at knifepoint to have sexual intercourse with him. She described the knife as a thin, white, pearl-handled stiletto. The defense…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Day v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
- State v. MartinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1960
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hughes v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. RoscoeArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- State v. BrunsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.