City of Augusta v. City of Waterville
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On agreed statement of facts. Action of assumpsit brought in the Superior Court, Kennebec County, by the plaintiff city against the defendant city to recover the sum of $54.10 expended by the plaintiff city for the relief of a pauper whose pauper settlement was alleged to be in the defendant city.
Read the full summary
On agreed statement of facts. Action of assumpsit brought in the Superior Court, Kennebec County, by the plaintiff city against the defendant city to recover the sum of $54.10 expended by the plaintiff city for the relief of a pauper whose pauper settlement was alleged to be in the defendant city. When the action came on for trial, an agreed statement of facts was filed and the case reported to the Law Court for determination with' the stipulation that if judgment should be for the plaintiff, it should be for $54.10 and costs; otherwise plaintiff should become nonsuit. The case is stated in…
1Opinion of the CourtPeabody, J.
This is an action authorized by statute brought by the City of Augusta against the City of Waterville to recover the amount expended by the overseers of the plaintiff city for the relief of a pauper alleged to have a settlement in the defendant city.
*396The case comes to this court for decision on the following agreed statement of facts and stipulations :
"State of Maine.
Kennebec, ss. Superior Court.
City of Augusta vs. City of Waterville.
Agreed Statement of Facts.
The account sued for in this case, amounting to $54.10, was for pauper supplies furnished by the City of Augusta to one Peter Vigue, and…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Merrill v. Eastland Woolen Mills, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- City of Auburn v. Inhabitants of FarmingtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- City of Rockland v. Inhabitants of LincolnvilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
- City of Augusta v. Inhabitants of AlnaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977