Legal Opinion
S. D. Warren Co. v. Fritz
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 6, 1942PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWorster, J.
On exceptions to the refusal of the justice presiding at the December Term, 1941, of the Superior Court held at Portland, within and for Cumberland County, State of Maine, to restore to the docket of that court, two separate tax-abatement appeals, which had been dismissed at a prior term of that court. Both appeals present the same questions of law, and will be considered together.
The appeals (one covering the 1933 taxes and the other the 1934 taxes) were taken to that court by the S. D. Warren Company, hereinafter called appellant, from the refusal of the tax assessors of Gorham in said…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Tutun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Karrick v. WetmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- McClelland v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- In Re Proceeding to Validate Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment Number SixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kradoska v. KippSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- State v. ShellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Leadbetter International Trucks, Inc. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Chute v. LajoieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Assessors, Town of Bristol v. EldridgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.