Legal Opinion

People v. Aguilar

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 15, 1994No. 3-93-0777PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stouder

The defendant, Raul Aguilar, Jr., was indicted on a charge of cannabis trafficking. Following a hearing on certain pretrial matters, the trial judge conducted an inquiry into whether the State intended to offer into evidence any statements made by the defendant. A dispute arose over the admissibility of certain statements made by the defendant at the scene of his arrest and also a formal statement the defendant made to the officers. The trial judge ruled that those statements constituted inadmissible hearsay. The State filed a timely notice of appeal, indicating substantive impairment of its…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. PaschIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. GonzalezIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. The People v. StantonIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. SimpsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. People v. CaffeyIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Halleck v. Coastal Building Maintenance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. People v. ShawAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. People v. ThorneAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API