Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1983No. 82-1340PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented is whether the court of appeals erred in overturning as against the manifest weight of the evidence the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court.

The test for insanity is set forth in State v. Staten (1969), 18 Ohio St. 2d 13 [47 O.O.2d 82], paragraph one of the syllabus, which states:

“One accused of criminal conduct is not responsible for such criminal conduct if, at the time of such conduct, as a result of mental disease or defect, he does not have the capacity either to know the wrongfulness of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of law.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. HumphriesOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. United States v. Evelio Mota and Juan FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. State v. StatenOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. United States v. Joseph Morris HallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. WereOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. FiliaggiOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Walker v. HollandOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. CurryOhio Supreme Court · 1989

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API