Legal Opinion

State v. Humphries

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1977No. Nos. 76-1150 and 76-1318PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

In Ohio, the common-law rule has been that in a criminal case the defendant has the burden of proving the affirmative defense of insanity by a preponderance of the evidence to overcome the presumption that he is sane.1

However, effective January 1, 1974, R. 0. 2901.05 was enacted, which reads in part:

“ (A) Every person accused of an offense is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and the burden of proof is upon the prosecution. The burden of going forward with the evidence of an affirmative defense is upon the accused.”

In State v. Robinson (1976), 47 Ohio St. 2d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. PooleOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. StatenOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. StatenOhio Supreme Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. BarkerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Ronald Krzeminski v. E. P. Perini, Superintendent, Marion Correction FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API