Legal Opinion

Schelbauer v. Butler Manufacturing Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1984No. L.A. 31736PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

This personal injury lawsuit presents two issues for resolution. First, is a postaccident warning alerting consumers to take safety precautions in using a product admissible in a strict liability action against a manufacturer? Second, may a trial court utilize a remittitur to reapportion liability among the parties if it concludes that the jury’s apportionment is not supported by the evidence and that the damage award is excessive only to the extent that it reflects an improper apportionment?

I

The facts are not in dispute. At the time of the accident, respondent, Duane…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Caprara v. Chrysler Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lane v. Hughes Aircraft Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Martin v. Six Flags Over Georgia II, L.P.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  4. West v. Johnson & Johnson Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Jeep Corp. v. MurrayNevada Supreme Court · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API