Legal Opinion
Trullinger v. Rosenblum
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided March 4, 1955No. Civ. 2842PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRIMBLE, Chief Judge.
On October 22, 1954, I prepared and filed a memorandum in this case in support of my conclusion that the motion to remand should be overruled.
After further investigation and research I have come to the conclusion that the opinion reached by me and announced in that memorandum was erroneous. In the first division of my opinion entered on October 22, 1954, reported in D.C., 125 F.Supp. 758, I went to some length to explain my reason for holding that the Removal Statute, sections 1441 to 1450, Title 28, U.S.C.A., makes no express provision whereby a counterclaim, compulsory…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. RaynorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Houghton v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- White v. Winchester Country ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mannington v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1910
- Lange v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ingram v. SterlingDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1956
- Continental Carriers, Inc. v. GoodpastureDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1959
- Hall v. BowmanDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1959
- Cabe v. Pennwalt CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1974
- Central Metal Products, Inc. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft, & Agricultural Implement WorkersDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.