Legal Opinion

Donald Alan Miller v. A.A. Stagner and R.L. Pulley, Leroy Freeman v. A.A. Stagner and R.L. Pulley

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1985No. 84-5980, 84-5981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

757 F.2d 988

Donald Alan MILLER, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

A.A. STAGNER and R.L. Pulley, Respondents-Appellees.

Leroy FREEMAN, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

A.A. STAGNER and R.L. Pulley, Respondents-Appellees.

Nos. 84-5980, 84-5981.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Jan. 9, 1985.

Decided April 8, 1985.

Donald Alan Miller, San Luis Obispo, Cal., Keith C. Monroe, Roger S. Hanson, Santa Ana, Cal., for petitioners-appellants.

Donald F. Roeschke, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Before…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. James WellsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. (HC) Schuster v. EspinozaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API