Smith v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.
1. Where upon, writ of certiorari the answer of the inferior tribunal to the petition for certiorari is neither traversed nor excepted to as provided by law, the superior court is bound by such answer. Rutland v. Hill, 19 Ga. App. 528 (91 S. E. 922); Roberson v. Fowler, 80 Ga. App. 248 (55 S. E. 2d, 862); Hopkins v. Southern Ry. Co., 110 Ga. 85 (1) (35 S. E. 307); Warren v. Wilson & Creekmur, 63 Ga. 372.
2. Where in a petition for certiorari one of the grounds of error alleged is the failure of the State to prove the venue of the crime, and the inferior tribunal in its answer to the petition…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Goodrum v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Hopkins v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Long v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Russell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Steele v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
- Steele v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989