Legal Opinion

Russell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 11, 1951No. 33389PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.

Headnote 1 requires no elaboration. “It is left to the sound discretion of the trial court to determine whether or not a child of tender years is a competent witness; and where the court examines a child as to its under standing of the nature of an oath and decides that it is competent to testify, this court will not interfere, where it does not appear that such discretion has been manifestly abused. Code, §§ 38-1607, 38-1610; Moore v. State, 79 Ga. 498 (3), 602 (5 S. E. 51); Beebee v. State, 124 Ga. 775 (53 S. E. 99); Young v. State, 125 Ga. 584 (4), 586 (54 S. E. 82); Frasier v. State, 143…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Frasier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ruff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Ernest L. Miller Co. v. GaunttCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Long v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API