Legal Opinion

State v. Caraveo

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 13, 2009No. 1 CA-CR 08-0878PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

¶ 1 The State of Arizona appeals from the trial court’s order granting Arturo Vega Ca-raveo’s motion to suppress evidence that police officers obtained after conducting a pat-down of his person. The State contends that the trial court erred by concluding that State v. Johnson, 217 Ariz. 58, 170 P.3d 667 (App. 2007), prohibits a citizen from consenting to a patdown search during a consensual encounter with police officers. For the following reasons, we agree, and, accordingly, reverse the trial court’s ruling and remand this matter to the trial court for additional…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Walsh v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists CharteredArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. WelchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. State of Arizona v. Feliciano Ontiveros-LoyaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. State v. MontesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API