Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Schumpert

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 21, 1906No. 15,909PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; Thomas Fletcher Bell, Judge. Action by Mack J. Stanley against T. E. Schumpert and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.

The action is one sounding in damages, which plaintiff in his petition fixes at $5,000.

In May, 1904, plaintiff called on Dr. Dowling, an oculist in the city of Shreveport, to have his eyes treated. The physician suggested that during the treatment he should stay at the Shreveport Sanitarium. His physician prescribed a mild solution to be applied under the direction of a trained nurse. On one of the early days in June of that year one of the nurses of the institution, owing to her carelessness, applied alcohol instead of the mild solution prescribed by the physician.

Plaintiffs avers that he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. Bodcaw Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  2. Nelson v. Crescent City RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  3. Evans v. Louisiana Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  4. Hart v. New Orleans & Carrollton Rail RoadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
  5. Anderson v. Elder, Dempster & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1901

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mulliner v. Evangelischer DiakonniessenvereinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Danks v. MaherLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Hill v. Tualatin AcademyOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Garlington v. KingsleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  5. Wetzel v. Omaha Maternity & General Hospital Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API