LOCAL FINANCE COMPANY OF SHELBY v. Jordan
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
The plaintiff seeks to restrain the breach of a written contract the parties executed. True, the validity of that contract is in dispute. Ordinarily, a -court of equity should not resolve a serious dispute without a full hearing on the merits. “It is generally proper, when the parties are at issue concerning the legal or equitable right, to grant an interlocutory injunction to preserve the right in statu quo until the determination of the controversy, an-d especially is this the rule when the principal relie-f sought is in itself an injunction, because a dissolution of a pending interlocutory…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cobb v. Clegg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Boone v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Charlotte City Coach Lines, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
3Cited by3 opinions
- A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- In Re the Application for Reassignment of AlbrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983