Owens v. Cerullo
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cubiam.
This action was instituted by the plaintiff to recover damages for injuries and loss sustained as a result of the alleged negligence of the defendants. The trial resulted in a general verdict against the defendants Eichard New, Max Sollonek, Sr., and Max Sollonek, Jr., for $15,000, and a verdict of no cause of action in favor of defendant Arthur Cerullo. Each defendant against whom the verdict went obtained a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside.
The testimony produced by the plaintiff at the trial tended to show the following matters of fact:
On November 7th,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Hawkes v. GollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- MONTREY v. PETER J. SCHWEITZER, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
- Ristan v. FrantzenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Cameron & Poulos v. LockhartWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Cameron & Poulos v. LockhartWyoming Supreme Court · 1958