Legal Opinion

Frink v. Prod

California Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1982No. L.A. 31453Published

1Opinion of the Court

31 Cal.3d 166 (1982)

643 P.2d 476

181 Cal. Rptr. 893

HELENE FRINK, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

GERALD PROD, as Director, etc., Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. L.A. 31453.

Supreme Court of California.

April 8, 1982.

COUNSEL

John E. McDermott, Mary S. Burdick, Richard A. Rothschild, Robert F. Tardiff, Jr., and Paul Ashby for Plaintiff and Appellant.

George Deukmejian, Attorney General, Thomas E. Warriner, Anne S. Pressman and Louis Verdugo, Jr., for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

BROUSSARD, J.

Helene Frink petitioned for writ of mandate to vacate an administrative decision denying benefits under the…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API