Legal Opinion

Rose v. Petaluma & Santa Rosa Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1923No. Civ. No. 4749PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

This is a petition for a writ of review to determine the lawfulness of an original award made by the Industrial Accident Commission in favor of respondent Railroad Company and the State Compensation Insurance Fund, denying petitioner relief for an injury claimed to have been sustained while he was in the employ of respondent company.

It is also sought by the petition to determine the lawfulness of an order denying an application for. a rehearing in the matter of said award and the finality resulting from such denial.

Petitioner was employed by defendant company as a stevedore for about four…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ehrhart v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Meekins v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. People v. PiscitellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Harris v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Larsson v. Cedars of Lebanon HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API