State v. Tuttle, Unpublished Decision (2-25-1999)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant William Tuttle appeals from the trial court's determination that he is a sexual predator. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
On May 16, 1983, defendant was indicted for three counts of raping his six-year-old daughter and one count of gross sexual imposition upon her. Defendant was subsequently convicted of all counts and received consecutive life sentences on the rape counts plus three to ten years imprisonment on the gross sexual imposition charge. This court affirmed. See State v. Tuttle (June 14, 1984), Cuyahoga App. No. 47698, unreported. Following enactment of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.