Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Norris

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2010No. 09-1229PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 brought by Alvin Jackson, an Arkansas prisoner facing execution. Jackson’s petition, before us for the second time, asserts, as relevant here, that he is mentally retarded and, therefore, his execution would violate the Eighth Amendment under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002) (the “Atkins claim”). In his first appeal, we reversed the district court’s dismissal of the Atkins claim on the basis of procedural default. See Jackson v. Norris (Jackson I), 256 Fed.Appx.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Keeney v. Tamayo-ReyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Timothy Johnston v. Al LuebbersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Andrew Sasser v. Ray HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  2. Heck Van Tran v. Roland ColsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. McGinest v. GTE Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
  5. Alvin Jackson v. Dexter PayneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API