Gunthorpe v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
Plaintiff Gary Gunthorpe appeals the grant of summary judgment to Defendants DaimlerChrysler Corporation (“Daimler-Chrysler”) and Carl Kraft, which disposed of claims arising from the termination of his employment. For the reasons stated hereafter, we REVERSE the grant of summary judgment as to Gunthorpe’s age discrimination claim and REMAND for further proceedings, but AFFIRM as to his remaining claims.
BACKGROUND
Gunthorpe began working for Daimler-Chrysler in 1995. Although originally employed as a tool engineer at the Dayton plant, he applied for the maintenance area supervisor position at…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Donald G. Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Charlie Dews v. A.B. Dick CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Western & Southern Life Insurance v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Shannon Most v. BWXT Nuclear Operations Grp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Stromberger v. Tampico Beverages Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021