Central Branch Railroad v. Fritz
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Jackson District Court. Replevin for a certain dwelling-house, brought by the Railroad Company, against Fritz. All necessary facts are stated in the subjoined opinion. The district court, at October Term 1876, gave judgment in favor of defendant, and the Railroad Company brings the case here on error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
Statement of the case. This was an action of replevin brought by the Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad Company, and Ralph M. Pomeroy, as Trustee, &c., against Henry T. Eritz, for the recovery of a house. The case was submitted to the court below upon the pleadings and upon an agreed statement of facts; and upon said pleadings and agreed statement of facts the court below found in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiffs, and rendered judgment accordingly. The principal material facts are as follows: The railroad company owned…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Van Ness v. PacardSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Eaves v. EstesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Davis v. EasleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
- Shoemaker, Miller & Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Huebschmann v. McHenryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Oregon Railway & Navigation Co. v. MosierOregon Supreme Court · 1887
- Cameron v. Oakland County Gas & Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Corbin v. KincaidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Eldridge v. HoeferOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- McCarty v. BurnetIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.