Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Murphy

California Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1904No. S.F. No. 3027PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

The action is based upon a judgment made and entered in favor of plaintiff against defendant in the Queen’s Bench division of the high court of justice of the supreme court of judicature in England on the eleventh day of November, 1898, for the sum of one thousand four hundred and fifty-four pounds and four shillings. The plaintiff obtained judgment, from which the defendant appealed.

1. There was no demurrer to the amended complaint. The appellant attacks it however upon the ground that it fails to state facts constituting a cause of action, in that it contains no facts showing that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wickersham v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Dore v. ThornburghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. KnutzenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Nesbit v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Jenner v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Estate of ChamberlainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Warren National Bank v. SuerkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API