Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1948Published

1DissentStacv, C. J.

The question for decision is whether statements or declarations of one paramour may be used against the other in a prosecution for fornication and adultery. The answer is to be found in the character and content of the statements or declarations. If they contain or amount to admissions or confessions of guilt, to that extent they are inhibited by the statute. Otherwise and if otherwise competent, they may be given or received in evidence.

The statute forbidding fornication and adultery, G.S. 14-184, is couched in the following language:

“If any man and woman, not being married to each other,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. . GeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Parrish v. Boysell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. State v. . MalpassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. State v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Powell v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API