Doyle v. Jennings
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. At the end of his day’s work, plaintiff went to his employer’s parking lot and entered the car of a coemployee who was to drive him home; and was thus within the precincts of the employment and exposed to its hazards when injured in the collision of automobiles operated by his coemployees. (Roberts v. Gagnon, 1 A D 2d 297.) The fact that a concurring purpose of the homeward trip was to enable the driver Jennings to pick up an appliance motor which plaintiff had given him does not affect compensability. (Matter…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Maines v. Cronomer Valley Fire Dept., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bagley v. GilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Cusano v. StaffNew York Supreme Court · 1992
- LeFever v. StultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983