Legal Opinion · Dissent

LeFever v. Stultz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1983Published

1DissentAsch, J.

I disagree with the majority with respect to their affirmance of Special Term’s denial of defendant Stultz’ cross motion for summary judgment. I would reverse as to that portion of Special Term’s order and grant defendant’s cross motion. Plaintiff K. M. LeFever and the defendant Ralph Stultz are assistant general counsel in the legal department of North American Philips Corporation. On January 6,1977, the defendant had lunch at the Portoroz Restaurant with Howard Stolte, credit manager of the Consumer Products Division of the same corporation. Both men imbibed some alcoholic beverages, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maines v. Cronomer Valley Fire Dept., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Matter of Wilson v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Claim of Cole v. Union Carbide Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Doyle v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Doyle v. JenningsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API